If the Police Officer Who Arrested Me was not in Proper Uniform or in a Marked Vehicle, Can He Testify at Pre-Trial Hearings?

The Fifth Appellate District has ruled that the statutes and Evidentiary Rules mentioned above only apply to trial testimony against the Defendant.  If the Defendant loses on his motion to suppress, and then pleads no contest, then no error has been committed if the police never actually testified in trial against the suspect.[1] This seems… Read More »

If the Police Officer Who Arrested Me Was Not in Proper Uniform or in a Marked Vehicle, Does That Mean That the Charges Against Me Must Be Dismissed?

In Ohio, the answer to this question is “maybe.” The first thing that should be noted is that for the officer to be found incompetent to testify, he must be out of uniform or in an unmarked car while he is Exclusively or Primarily On Duty for the purpose of enforcing the traffic laws. In… Read More »

What Rule or Law Requires Police Officers on Traffic Duty to Be in Proper Uniform and in Marked Police Vehicles?

The Ohio Rules of Evidence, specifically  Evid. R. 601(C ) describes persons incompetent to testify in court proceedings.  One of these incompetents is: An officer, while on duty for the exclusive or main purpose of enforcing traffic laws, arresting or assisting in the arrest of a person charged with a traffic violation punishable as a… Read More »